Politicians v. Experts: The Latest on “Value-added” Modeling

Screen Shot 2013-01-30 at 7.53.45 AM

I find it disconcerting that Cuomo (and the feds) are punishing the New York City Schools by withholding $400 million because they refuse to adopt “value-added” modeling that some consider as “frauds” and “junk science.” Growth models were also an issue in the recent Chicago teacher strike. Who should we listen to on value-added modeling? The politicians or the experts? It’s a sexy catch phrase “value-added,” but politicians typically don’t have a clue how they work— even as they espouse their virtues. Want to have a little fun? Ask your local mayor, governor, Arne Duncan… etc. to specify a growth model. (See a model specification that I borrowed in the featured image).

Fortunate for us, there are experts qualified to advise politicians (if they will listen— they haven’t yet) on how growth models actually function when measuring classroom achievement relative to teachers and their serious limitations. The online peer-reviewed journal Education Policy Analysis Archives (EPAA) has dealt with growth models extensively. One of my favorites is Value-added modeling of teacher effectiveness: an exploration of stability across models and contexts by Xiaoxia A. Newton, Linda Darling-Hammond, Edward Haertel, Ewart Thomas. They found:

Judgments of teacher effectiveness for a given teacher can vary substantially across statistical models, classes taught, and years. Furthermore, student characteristics can impact teacher rankings, sometimes dramatically, even when such characteristics have been previously controlled statistically in the value-added model. A teacher who teaches less advantaged students in a given course or year typically receives lower effectiveness ratings than the same teacher teaching more advantaged students in a different course or year. Models that fail to take student demographics into account further disadvantage teachers serving large numbers of low-income, limited English proficient, or lower-tracked students. We examine a number of potential reasons for these findings, and we conclude that caution should be exercised in using student achievement gains andvalue-added methods to assess teachers’ effectiveness, especially when the stakes are high.

Also fortunate for us, EPAA has just published several articles and two video commentaries as part of the Special Issue on Value-Added: What America’s Policymakers Need to Know and Understand. The online issue was guest edited by Dr. Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Dr. Clarin Collins, Dr. Sarah Polasky, and Ed Sloat. Here is the most recent expert work on value-added modeling:

Baker, B.D., Oluwole, J., Green, P.C. III (2013) The legal consequences of
 mandating high stakes decisions based on low quality information: Teacher 
evaluation in the race-to-the-top era. Education Policy Analysis Archives,
21(5). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1298

Pullin, D. (2013). Legal issues in the use of student test scores and
 value-added models (VAM) to determine educational quality. Education Policy
 Analysis Archives, 21(6). Retrieved from 

Kersting, N. B., Chen, M., & Stigler, J. W. (2013). Value-added Teacher Estimates as Part of Teacher Evaluations: Exploring the Effects of Data and Model Specifications on the Stability of Teacher Value-added scores. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(7). Retrieved from 

Graue, M.E., Delaney, K.K., & Karch, A.S. (2013). Ecologies of education
 quality. Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 21(8). Retrieved from

Gabriel, R. & Lester, J. N. (2013). Sentinels guarding the grail:
 Value-added measurement and the quest for education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 21 (9). Retrieved from 

Adler, M. (2013). Findings vs. Interpretation in “The Long-Term Impacts of 
Teachers by Chetty et al.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 21
(10). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1264

The experts have spoken. Will politicians listen?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Categories: Teacher Quality

Author:Julian Vasquez Heilig

Julian Vasquez Heilig is an award-winning researcher and teacher. He is currently a Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies and the Director of the Doctorate in Educational Leadership at California State Sacramento.

Social Media



  1. From the Mailbag: You, sir, are no reformer | Cloaking Inequity - March 17, 2013

    […] team. He spent his twelve minutes singing the accolades of the LA Times and their teacher value added growth models. I asked him, “Explain to me how a growth model works… Can you specify the equation? […]

  2. Can we get teacher evaluation right?: Bill Gates, Tom Brady, and Linda Darling-Hammond | Cloaking Inequity - April 4, 2013

    […] one of the most contentious issues in educational policy today. Here on CI I recently discussed how policymakers have ignored the experts on the use of VAM statistical models. I will be honest, I have not often been a fan of how the […]

  3. Actual Educators on Reforming US Assessment Paradigm | Cloaking Inequity - June 30, 2013

    […] we get teacher evaluation right?: Bill Gates, Tom Brady, and Linda Darling-Hammond and Politicians v. Experts: The Latest on “Value-added” Modeling) So what do actual educators think about assessment? Their voices are so often drowned out in the […]

  4. Are Data and Statistics Bulletproof in Educational Policy Development? | Cloaking Inequity - July 31, 2013

    […] about this study is that we utilized Value Added Models (VAM) (Yes those same models that politicians and actual experts disagree on) We wrote that VAM models show a negative association between achievement and Culturally Relevant […]

  5. Breaking News: Sec. Duncan and Sec. Bennett are Kissing Cousins | Cloaking Inequity - August 30, 2013

    […] Check Race To The Top and Growth Models  (See also Politicians v. Experts: The Latest on “Value-added” Modeling) […]

  6. A Top Ten of Duncan’s Inanity: Obama’s Basketball Buddy Drops Ball on Ed | Cloaking Inequity - November 18, 2013

    […] Value-added models are the opposite of transparency. The use of VAM models by policymakers may be the most convoluted conversation in educational policy today. See Politicians v. Experts: The Latest on “Value-added” Modeling […]

  7. Can we Evaluate #Teachers Without Using High-Stakes #Testing? | Cloaking Inequity - November 12, 2014

    […] and teacher evaluation systems is due to the fact that they are being forced to rely upon “junk science” statistical modeling that utilizes non-generalizable data from test scores. As an alternative, PAR is a locally-based […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,710 other followers

%d bloggers like this: