News Ticker

The Progressive Magazine: Education needs to be on the agenda at the Iowa Debate

I was recently flummoxed (this really is an underused word in the English language) by the lack of conversation about K-12 education in the recent Democratic debate in Las Vegas. The Progressive Magazine asked me to reflect on the dearth of coverage. Here is the piece they published Why The Democratic Presidential Debate Ignored Education

The recent Democratic Party presidential debate in Las Vegas left many observers scratching their heads. Why did the candidates and their CNN hosts ignore K-12 education?

Is education not important enough to merit discussion as a top national priority in 2016? The public clearly cares about education. US News reports that education is the third ranked search term on Google. When Gallup asked an open-ended question on the most important issues to voters in the 2016 campaign, education came in sixth.

Perhaps the silence is due to the fact that the Democrats have basically adopted the Republican approach to education from the 1990s.

As a university professor, I know plagiarism occasionally comes up in student work. Perhaps the Democrats are not discussing education because they don’t want to be accused of plagiarism by the Republican Party.

If you look at George H.W. Bush’s education platform of 1992, you see that Republicans have been focused on maligning unions, promoting alternative certification for teachers via programs like Teach For America, and pushing an agenda of school choice, assessments, and one-size-fits-all standards.

The Democrats’ current approach to education policy, as practiced by President Barack Obama and his acolytes (including Chicago Mayor Rahm Emmanuel), appears to be the same. Obama did not create “change” in education.  He pressed the educational policy status quo that the Republicans engineered in the 1990s. For most of Obama’s presidency, George W. Bush’s NCLB (directly imported from Texas in the 1990s) was left alone and even enhanced via “waivers” and Race to the Top.

Is that why the Democratic Party candidates are so quiet on education? Many in the education community are worried that the current slate of candidates will adopt ideas for education reform eerily similar to the Republicans’ ideas of the 1990s—more of the same with a different framing.

There certainly are other ideas that are worth considering. Before the recent Democratic debate, CNN solicited questions from the general public via the hashtag #DemDebate from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. In response, community groups across the nation coalesced to submit important debate questions about K-12 education on social media.

personally submitted ten questions to CNN via Instagram, Facebook and Twitter. I had hoped that CNN would ask the candidates to discuss financial and equity accountability for charter schools, a national teacher quality strategy, high-stakes testing and Common Core, the school-to-prison pipeline, and other pressing topics that Democrats have neglected for the past seven years.

The complete absence of questions about K-12 education was clearly negligence on CNN’s part. Surely our nation’s nearly $600 billion K-12 endeavor merits coverage in a presidential debate—at least as much as Bernie Sanders’s thoughts on Hillary Clinton’s emails.

I am hopeful that the Democratic candidates will abandon the 1990s Republican education platform. There are research-supported alternatives, including community-based approaches such as high quality Pre-K supported by municipalities, non-corporate locally-controlled charters, and locally based assessment of students, teachers, and schools.

In the upcoming Iowa debate, CBS and the Des Moines Register should press Democrats on whether they will abandon the education platforms of George W. Bush and Barack Obama, and the candidates should welcome the opportunity to chart a new course by introducing community-based alternatives for education policy. Clearly, education can be a winning issue for Democrats as it is “the top turn out message,” according to recently conducted survey. If Hillary, Bernie, or any of the other candidates want to capture the hearts and minds of the Democratic base and primary voters, they should turn the page on the Republican’s 1990s ideas for education policy.

– See more at: http://progressive.org/news/2015/10/188372/why-democratic-presidential-debate-ignored-education#sthash.rwHMdpvK.dpuf

Julian Vasquez Heilig is the Westcoast Regional Fellow of the Progressive Education Fellows.

To view the other 9 questions I filmed for the Las Vegas #DemDebate see 2015 Las Vegas @CNN #DemDebate Top 10 Education Questions for the 2015 Las Vegas @CNN #DemDebate

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Want to know about Cloaking Inequity’s freshly pressed conversations about educational policy? Click the “Follow blog by email” button on the home page.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

Click here for Vitae.

Advertisements
About Dr. Julian Vasquez Heilig (688 Articles)
Julian Vasquez Heilig is an award-winning researcher and teacher. He is currently a Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies and the Director of the Doctorate in Educational Leadership at California State Sacramento.

1 Comment on The Progressive Magazine: Education needs to be on the agenda at the Iowa Debate

  1. Cory Wofford // October 22, 2015 at 2:22 am // Reply

    I believe that one of the reasons the candidates did not address education, particularly public education, is because they were/are afraid of appearing as critics of President Obsma, so early in the primary. They don’t want to alienate a base that could mean the difference between a nomination and a chance of occupying the White House. I believe it is also harder for them to speak about education when they have possibly, at one time or another, taken positions on education that could be interpreted as a ‘page from the playbook’ of the party that they are rallying again’t. I also think that the kind of systems level thinking that is needed when you are trying to transform any system is difficult when the environment (such as the debate) is structured in a way that rewards the person who can offer up a short, pithy 60-second sound bite to try and capture the hearts of an electorate challenged by social norms that are dictated by immediacy.

    Like

3 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The Progressive Magazine: Education needs to be on the agenda at the Iowa Debate | waltercrunkite
  2. A WOW from @HillaryClinton on Charter Schools | Cloaking Inequity
  3. Republicans right to address education, but wrong on agenda | Cloaking Inequity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: