History always gives names to moments that once felt impossible to define. We talk about the Roaring Twenties, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Great Depression as if they were simple, unified eras instead of turbulent, overlapping struggles. Those labels compress confusion into clarity. They tell future generations what a time was about—what it fought for, what it feared, what it changed. Someday, historians will try to name this era too. They will look back on our division, our debates, our technological revolutions, and our cultural shifts and search for one phrase that explains it all. The question is, what will they call us?

Will it be remembered as the MAGA Era, a time defined by populism, polarization, and the pull of nostalgia? Or as the Late Empire Era, when American dominance began to wane and its contradictions could no longer be ignored? Maybe it will be something more subtle, more hopeful, or more tragic. The name will not come from those shouting the loudest now but from those who can see the pattern only once the noise fades. Here are five possibilities for what this political and cultural moment might someday be called in the history books.

1. The MAGA Era

Whether one admires or abhors it, the phrase “Make America Great Again” has already shaped history. To call this the MAGA Era would be to recognize how one slogan and red hats captured a national mood of anger and redefined politics as a battle over belonging. In this era, patriotism became performance, grievance became identity, and outrage became the organizing force of civic life. Donald Trump’s rise was not an accident but an eruption—an expression of resentment toward people of color, institutions, and cultural shifts that left many feeling invisible.

The MAGA Era is not only about Trump himself but about the anger he weaponized. It is an age of nostalgia for a whiter, simpler America—and rage toward the pluralistic, diverse nation that has emerged. It is the era of rallies, red hats, right-wing violence, and cultural realignment, where politics feels less like debate and more like devotion. But it is also an era of resistance, where movements for inclusion, equity, and democracy are reasserting their power in defiance of authoritarian populism.

If future generations call this the MAGA Era, they will see it as the moment when American democracy was tested by the politics of domination and the seductive pull of the racialized past. Trump’s rule was not merely the reign of an outrageous personality—it was the exercise of raw power by a man who used money, influence, and fear to bend people and even nations to his will. He governed less as a public servant than as a would-be strongman, demanding loyalty over law and obedience over truth. The MAGA Era, then, is not only a reflection of one man’s ambition but of a society’s struggle to decide whether it will be ruled by democracy or submission to power.

The MAGA Era will not only be remembered for its division but for its exposure. It tore the mask off American life, revealing what was always there: deep distrust, widening inequality, and exhaustion with systems that were never built to serve everyone equally. Like every populist wave in history, it forced elites to listen but also tempted them to manipulate. Some learned to speak the language of resentment, feeding it with race-baiting politics, ICE raids, and nationalist theater. Others tried to redirect that anger through unions, social investment, and democratic reform. Both sides claimed to hear “the people,” but one stoked fear while the other tried, unevenly, to rebuild faith.

2. The Era of Fragmentation

Another possible name for our time is the Era of Fragmentation. Nothing today feels whole. Our institutions, our media, our communities—even our sense of reality—have splintered into smaller, disconnected parts. The social fabric that once bound us together has been stretched to its limit. We live in customized worlds, each filtered through algorithms that reward anger and certainty over curiosity and compromise.

The Era of Fragmentation is not only digital but emotional. People increasingly inhabit separate moral and cultural universes. Facts are debated, trust is scarce, and attention itself has become the rarest commodity. We are connected by technology yet isolated by ideology. Every new platform promises community but delivers conflict. The more we can broadcast, the less we seem to hear.

Still, fragmentation has not been entirely destructive. It has made room for new voices and identities that were once excluded. Movements for racial justice, gender equality, and climate action have used this fractured space to organize in ways that traditional institutions could not. The same networks that divide us also allow marginalized people to be seen and heard. The tragedy of fragmentation is that it contains both the disease and the cure.

If historians choose this name, it will reflect not only our disunity but our unfinished search for coherence. The Era of Fragmentation may eventually be remembered as the painful but necessary step toward a new kind of solidarity—one built not on sameness, but on mutual recognition.

3. The Second Gilded Age

The parallels between our time and the late nineteenth century are striking. Like that earlier period, this Second Gilded Age is defined by extraordinary wealth, technological transformation, and deep inequality. A small class of billionaires now holds power that rivals governments. Their companies shape how we work, communicate, and even think. Artificial intelligence, automation, and social media have created fortunes beyond imagination while destabilizing the very concept of work. The excess is no longer symbolic but structural. They even tore down part of the White House to build a two-hundred-million-dollar ballroom for gilded parties, paid for by billionaire corporations such as Palantir, Lockheed, and others that receive billions in government contracts and benefits from the current administration. It is an era where corruption dresses as partnership, and where access to power can be purchased by the highest bidder.

The original Gilded Age dazzled with steel, railroads, and electricity while it hid poverty, child labor, and corruption. Today’s version glitters with apps, algorithms, and innovation while concealing mental health crises, wage stagnation, and economic precarity. In both cases, the surface shines while the foundation cracks. The stock market thrives as public schools crumble. Philanthropy replaces policy, and public good becomes a branding exercise for private wealth. Billionaires are treated as both saviors and symptoms of decline, their generosity celebrated while their influence escapes scrutiny.

Yet the Second Gilded Age, like the first, may also be the prelude to reform. The Progressive Era that followed the 1890s brought labor protections, antitrust laws, and voting rights. Our own time may yet produce a similar reckoning. Unions are resurgent, young people are demanding fairness, and the myth that markets can solve everything is losing credibility. The Second Gilded Age could end not with collapse, but with correction. Its name would remind future generations that excess always invites accountability, and that no ballroom, however gilded, can hide the cracks in a democracy built on inequality.

4. The Age of Reckoning

If the Gilded Age speaks to wealth, the Age of Reckoning speaks to conscience. This era has forced the United States to confront long-avoided truths about race, gender, inequality, and climate. Movements such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo have pulled the veil off systems of privilege and abuse, while Indigenous activism has exposed how even the nation’s most celebrated institutions were built on dispossession. Land grant universities, once symbols of opportunity, have been revealed to owe their endowments and campuses to the sale of lands taken from Native nations and sold to directly fund their establishment. These institutions, along with corporations and governments, are now being challenged to reconcile their ideals with their origins. The air itself reminds us of our environmental debts, as climate disasters turn abstraction into urgency.

Reckoning does not come gently. It arrives through protest, discomfort, and debate. It divides families and rewrites textbooks. It unsettles the comfortable and forces those in power to answer for the foundations beneath them. Across the country, citizens are documenting abuses of power, from immigration raids to police misconduct, insisting that no agency or uniform is above the law. Even if federal officers receive federal pardons for their actions, state law still applies to offenses such as kidnapping, assault, and other crimes, and state courts and prosecutors retain the authority to investigate and hold people accountable. Accountability is no longer an abstract principle but a living demand. The call is not for vengeance but for justice, for a nation where transparency replaces secrecy and human rights outweigh political fear.

This era is not only about exposing injustice but about redefining accountability itself. The idea that power must be answerable has spread beyond politics to workplaces, media, and culture. What some call cancel culture is, at its core, an insistence on memory and consequence. The Age of Reckoning may not yet have delivered resolution, but it has shattered complacency. History may remember this time as the beginning of a long and painful correction, when the nation finally stopped pretending that progress was automatic and began the harder work of earning it.

5. The Late Empire Era

Finally, some may call this the Late Empire Era. The United States remains powerful, but its authority no longer feels unchallenged. The optimism that once defined American identity has faded into anxiety about decline. Wars, recessions, and political instability have eroded the myth of exceptionalism. The world no longer looks to Washington for moral guidance or leadership in the way it once did. At the United Nations, American influence is increasingly defied, not because the nation has lost its armies, but because it has lost its credibility.

Like all late empires, this one struggles to see its own limits. Its power rests on decades of massive spending on military technology instead of on housing, healthcare, or education for its own people. The weapons that fill the world’s conflicts were built while millions at home lived in poverty. The empire’s strength is its weakness, a monument to misplaced priorities. Now even that vast military machine is being sustained by private donors, billionaires, and defense corporations that treat war as a business model. The same contractors who fund political campaigns and White House galas, companies like Palantir and Lockheed Martin, reap billions in public contracts, turning national defense into a profit stream. These are not the actions of a republic guided by principle but of an empire whose moral center has hollowed out. Pride and wealth have become substitutes for justice and compassion, as they once did in Rome and Britain before their decline.

Yet late empires can also change. Britain reinvented itself after empire through diplomacy and culture. Rome’s collapse gave birth to new faiths and civic structures that redefined civilization itself. America, too, could use its twilight not to resist decline but to model humility, cooperation, and sustainability. The Late Empire Era could be the beginning of a more mature national identity, one that values partnership over dominance and humanity over hubris. If this becomes our era’s name, it will remind future generations that decline is not destiny. It is a choice between clinging to power or rediscovering purpose, a choice that will define whether this empire ends in arrogance or in awakening.

Conclusion: The Era We Choose

History does not ask for our permission before naming us. It will not remember our tweets, our press conferences, or our partisan victories. It will remember what we built and what we broke, who we lifted and who we left behind. The names that endure, such as the Civil Rights Movement, the Great Depression, and the New Deal, are not given by the powerful but by the people who refused to look away. Our era, whatever historians call it, is still being written.

We are living at the intersection of possibility and decay. We have the wealth to end poverty and the technology to heal the planet, yet we keep choosing conflict and consumption over compassion and care. We are powerful, but our power is hollow when it is hoarded. We can no longer mistake dominance for strength or distraction for progress. What we are witnessing, the anger, the fragmentation, the reckoning, and the arrogance of empire, is not the end of a story. It is the middle of one. The question is whether we have the courage to turn the page.

And make no mistake, history will tell the truth. It does not matter how many books the right wing tries to ban, how many data sets are erased, or how many libraries are stripped bare. The facts have a way of resurfacing. Historians will do their job. They will dig through the archives, reconstruct the record, and remind the world what really happened in our time. If America can face its contradictions with humility instead of denial, this age may yet be remembered as a turning point rather than a downfall. I still believe in the possibility of renewal, not because I am naïve, but because history shows that reckoning always precedes rebirth. The future is not waiting for a savior or a slogan. It is waiting for citizens who remember that democracy is not a performance but a practice. The era we live in will be called whatever we choose to make of it. Let it be the time when we stopped mistaking power for purpose and finally began to build a nation worthy of its promise.

Please share.

---

Julian Vasquez Heilig is a nationally recognized policy scholar, public intellectual, and civil rights advocate. A trusted voice in public policy, he has testified for state legislatures, the U.S. Congress, the United Nations, and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, while also advising presidential and gubernatorial campaigns. His work has been cited by major outlets including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times, and he has appeared on networks from MSNBC and PBS to NPR and DemocracyNow!. He is a recipient of more than 30 honors, including the 2025 NAACP Keeper of the Flame Award, Vasquez Heilig brings both scholarly rigor and grassroots commitment to the fight for equity and justice.