Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…)

1–2 minutes

·

·

Vasquez Heilig, J. & Jez, S. (2010). Teach For America: A review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado. Retrieve from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teach-for-america

Teach For America (TFA) aims to address teacher shortages by sending graduates from elite colleges, most of whom do not have a background in education, to teach in low-income rural and urban schools for a two-year commitment. The impact of these graduates is hotly debated by those who, on the one hand, see this as a way to improve the supply of teachers by enticing some of America’s top students into teaching and those who, on the other hand, see the program as a harmful dalliance into the lives of low-income students who most need highly trained and highly skilled teachers. The question for most districts, however, is whether TFA teachers do as well as or better than credentialed non-TFA teachers with whom school districts aim to staff their schools. On this question, studies indicate that the students of novice TFA teachers perform significantly less well in reading and mathematics than those of credentialed beginning teachers. Thus, a simple answer to the question of TFA teachers’ relative effectiveness cannot be conclusively drawn from the research; many factors are involved in any comparison. The lack of a consistent impact, however, should indicate to policymakers that TFA is likely not the panacea that will reduce disparities in educational outcomes. The evidence suggests that districts may benefit from using TFA personnel to fill teacher shortages when the available labor pool consists of temporary or substitute teachers or other novice alternatively and provisionally certified teachers likely to leave in a few years. Nevertheless, if educational leaders plan to use TFA teachers as a solution to the problem of shortages, they should be prepared for constant attrition and the associated costs of ongoing recruitment and training.

See my discussion of the TFA brief at a US Senate briefing on S. 1716. A conversation on Louisiana PBS Teach for America in Louisiana and Seattle KURO Radio 97.3 Teach For America in Seattle

Vasquez Heilig, J. & Jez, S. (2010). Teach For America: A review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado. Retrieve from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teach-for-america Teach For America (TFA) aims to address teacher shortages by sending graduates from elite colleges, most of whom do not have a background in education, to teach in low-income rural…

28 responses to “Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…)”

  1. […] Policy Center (NEPC). As a fellow, I have published two policy briefs on Teach For America (Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…) and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The Sequel). I have also peer reviewed various […]

    Like

  2. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  3. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  4. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  5. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  6. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  7. […] leading authorities on Teach for America. He has studied their performance over time (see here and here), and he is not a fan. When Mathematica released its latest study of TFA, Heilig read it […]

    Like

  8. […] also two NEPC policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The […]

    Like

  9. […] asked me to author two policy briefs examining all of the peer review research on the organization (Teach For America: A review of the evidence and Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence (The Sequel), the calls from the media increased […]

    Like

  10. […] who have no teaching license or experience and very little training (typically participants in Teach for America, as students in traditional teacher preparation programs do not qualify) will continue to receive […]

    Like

  11. […] I can understand your daughter’s unfortunate outcome, I have supported this program over the years as a model to address persistent socioeconomic achievement gaps in public education by recruiting highly qualified, dedicated recent graduates to teach in disadvantaged, low-income urban and rural districts.  But it turns out, it is not as good as advertised. The practical question faced by most districts is whether TFA teachers do as well as or better than fully credentialed non-TFA teachers with whom those school districts aim to staff their schools. On this question, the predominance of peer-reviewed studies have indicated that, on average, the students of novice TFA teachers perform less well in reading and mathematics assessments than those of fully credentialed beginning teachers. Although the differences are small, TFA teachers do better if compared to other less-trained and inexperienced teachers. Again, the comparison group matters greatly. (See Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence) […]

    Like

  12. […] Center (NEPC) released Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence. It is the sequel to the 2010 Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence. Teach For America has asked for a dialogue. They have posted responses on Pass The Chalk. We have […]

    Like

  13. […] Center (NEPC) released Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence. It is the sequel to the 2010 Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence. TFA has responded. Raegen Miller, TFA’s VP of Research Partnerships, has asked us to keep the […]

    Like

  14. […] sequel to the 2010 Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence was released by the National Education Policy Center (NEPC) today. The new policy report is […]

    Like

  15. […] study that says their teachers are effective at getting results in middle-school math, but most evidence points to the conclusion that TFA alums don’t do as well as credentialed teachers. More recently, […]

    Like

  16. […] Today a reader gave me the heads up that FedEx wants to make a $300,000 commitment to Teach For America (TFA). (See http://blog.van.fedex.com/countlesspossibilities) They will donate a dollar of every One Rate transaction (Their attempt to compete with the US postal service Priority Mail). They call this effort #countlesspossibilities. I have written extensively about TFA’s temporary agency approach for poor kids. See my editorial in the New York Times entitled A Glorified Temp Agency. (For all of Cloaking Inequity’s posts on TFA click here)  Also, in January 2014, NEPC will release the new policy brief entitled Teach For America: A Return to the Evidence, the sequel to Teach For America: A review of the evidence  […]

    Like

  17. […] the comprehensive 2010 National Education Policy Center (NEPC) TFA brief (See Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…), we received many requests for input from parents and educators across the nation regarding the […]

    Like

  18. […] TFA will be released soon in the new 2013 NEPC TFA brief. For the 2010 NEPC TFA brief see the post Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…) For all of Cloaking Inequity’s post on Teach for America go […]

    Like

  19. […] Soon after the release of the study, I posted my first impressions of the study in New Mathematica TFA Study is Irrational Exuberance. I have also asked scholars across the nation to take a peek at the Mathematica study. Perhaps because there may be some that believe I have some bias against TFA or Mathematica. Which I don’t. (I actually have several friends that work in high places for TFA, including one of my best friends. Shout out to TLG and LET. Don’t do it EP. For the record, when they ask, I do let them know about the peer-reviewed research based on TFA. See Teach For America: A review of the evidence) […]

    Like

  20. […] said this. Russo, in case you care what a extensive review of peer-reviewed research says on TFA go here. Of note, we will release a new NEPC TFA brief in the next few […]

    Like

  21. […] Reflection: Teach For American attrition approaches 80% in years 3-4. See Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…) […]

    Like

  22. […] many non-peer reviewed studies that analyze TFA— which produce mixed results— as we discussed here. Su Jin Jez, Cal State Sacramento faculty member (also a good friend of mine since grad school), […]

    Like

  23. Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.

    Like

  24. […] of government funding and positive feel-good press, our independent review of peer-reviewed research published by NEPC found that TFA has a high-turnover rate, is costly (We calculated that the actual […]

    Like

  25. […] 2010, in our policy brief entitled Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence we […]

    Like

  26. […] have discussed Teach For America (TFA) previously in the New York Times and in widely-discussed brief for the NEPC. See CI’s full TFA thread here. Larry Hill recently sent along an email that was […]

    Like

  27. […] JULIAN VASQUEZ HEILIG & SU JIN JEZ, Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence, National Education Policy Center […]

    Like

  28. […] has conducted important research on Teach for America and KIPP that reviews their […]

    Like

Leave a comment

Cloaking Inequity is an online platform for justice and liberty-minded readers. I publish reflections, analysis, and commentary on education, democracy, culture, and politics.

Subscribe to stay informed whenever I publish new content. I never send spam, and you can unsubscribe anytime—no strings attached.

Go back

Your message has been sent

Email me at jvh@alumni.stanford.edu