Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context

Vasquez Heilig, J. & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Accountability Texas-style: The progress and learning of urban minority students in a high-stakes testing context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 30(2), 75-110.
This study examines longitudinal student progress and achievement on the elementary, middle, and high school levels in relation to accountability policy incentives in a large urban district in Texas. Using quantitative analyses supplemented by qualitative interviews, the authors found that high-stakes testing policies that rewarded and punished schools based on average student scores created incentives for schools to “game the system” by excluding students from testing and, ultimately, school. In the elementary grades, low-achieving students were disproportionately excluded from taking the high-stakes Texas Assessment of Academic Skills tests, demonstrating gains not reflected on the low-stakes Stanford Achievement Test-Ninth Edition. Student exclusion at the elementary level occurred through special education and language exemptions and missing scores. Furthermore, gaming strategies reduced educational opportunity for African American and Latino high school students. Sharp increases in 9th-grade student retention and disappearance were associated with increases in 10th-grade test scores and related accountability ratings.
Pingback: Failing the Test: Nine Solution Takeaways – Capital & Main
Pingback: Who’s the William Wallace of testing: @JessedHagopian or Liz King? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: The Test: The Bad News (civil rights facade) and Good News (local accountability) | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: My Inspiration and Anger: One day Gary disappeared | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Responding to Teachers Questions: A Social Media Recipe? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Can we Evaluate #Teachers Without Using High-Stakes #Testing? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Uncovering Lies and Damn Lies in Arne Duncan’s Graduation Rates | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: A-F Accountability Letter Grades: Reform or Different Name, More of the Same? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: The “War Report” Radio Show: False Promise of NCLB for Public Education | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Pile of Old Books vs. Citizens as Critical Participants in the Great Education Debates | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Home | The Equity Alliance at ASU
Pingback: Obama’s approach to education in the 2014 State of the Union | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Breaking News: Leno on Latest TX Education Miracle | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Academia Esoteric and Inaccessible?: Not this month | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Students get some relief/freedom from testing in Texas? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: LA and the Recovery School District approach (SB1718): A P.T. Barnum Circus | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Soiled Legacy: The Birth of No Child Left Behind in Texas | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Texas Enrontizes Federal Graduation Data? | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Guess which state is 3rd “Dumbest in the Nation”?! | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Lurking in the Bushes: Peeking at Florida Education Miracle | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: 1st Annual Educational Policy Turkey of the Year Award | Cloaking Inequity
Pingback: Bad Apples?: Accountability, AYP and Cheating | Cloaking Inequity