Alter: Its folly to cap charters schools— silly NEA. What are you thinking?
Vasquez Heilig: Here’s why. Because according to a Stanford study (conducted by CREEDO, a traditionally conservative think tank ) 83% of charters across the nation do not perform better than traditional public schools.
I then went on to discuss the Texas charters and KIPP study published in the peer-reviewed journal Berkeley Review of Education. I have previously profiled our study, KIPP’s response, and my response to their response. See the entire KIPP thread here.
Anyways, why let data get in the way of ideology?
There is also some backstory about why we even studied KIPP and African American dropout and attrition. However, I can only tell you in person and not on national TV, so ask me next time you see me.
There are amazing charters… there is no doubt. Two of my favorites are Making Waves and University of Texas Elementary School. If anything, these successful charters demonstrate that money does matter. They are able to spend thousands of dollars more on their students compared to traditional public schools. As does KIPP (KIPP Austin—$17,286 versus Austin ISD—$10,667) kudos to them for that! Note to Texas Legislature: Cutting $5.3 billion from schools these past two years=terrible public policy. See our study of school finance and majority Latina/o urban elementary schools here.
**Edit** 9/25/2012 One the students in my Fall 2012 school reform course wrote today in a reflection:
Public facts are shared by many people in a society who have no, or very little personal knowledge. This limits the scope of a social issue.
**Edit** 8/2/2012 See this blog post from Jersey Jazzman on Alter’s head popping off.