Florida’s New College Entrance Exam: Is CLT A Trojan Horse for Ideological Indoctrination?

The education community is buzzing about Florida’s new Classic Learning Test (CLT) college entrance exam, a significant departure from traditional standardized tests like the SAT and ACT. But what many may not realize is the loaded political and ideological baggage that accompanies this shift to a “classical” exam.

I weighed in this week and offered perspective on the emerging issue through my appearances on NBC and in Axios, drawing upon my academic scholarship focusing on curriculum and testing policy.

The new Florida college entrance exam is making waves in the education world because it marks a considerable change from the SAT and ACT. But many people might not be aware of the heavy political and ideological baggage that comes with this change. I weighed in on NBC News here. Also, in an Axios story entitled Florida eyes “classical” education agenda I made the following point

“So-called “classical education is really a wolf in sheep’s clothing”

Julian Vasquez Heilig, Axios 2023

This blog quickly introduces some of our scholarly work that underlies why I made the points that I made in the NBC and Axios interviews. All of the articles are available for free in pdf form on Academia.edu.

The case of Debra P. v. Turlington in Florida history

We must first turn to history in order to fully comprehend the significance of this development. Standardized testing and the state of Florida have a protracted, contentious relationship. A sharp reminder is provided by the seminal case Debra P. v. Turlington from the early 1980s. The NAACP filed a lawsuit against the state of Florida, claiming that African Americans were the targets of discrimination in standardized testing. It would appear that history is in risk of repeating itself. We discuss these concepts and the case in the peer review article:

Holme, J. & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2012). High stakes decisions: The legal landscape of gatekeeping exit exams and the implications for schools and leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 22(6), 1177-1197.

The Political Consequences: Not Just a Test

The new test is not just a minor adjustment to earlier tests. It’s not just one more obstacle for students to get through. It’s a tectonic shift that might have profoundly unsettling effects on educational prospects and outcomes. This test indicates a deliberate political ploy covered up as academic change, inspired by PragerU and Hillsdale curricula—organizations recognized for narrow and exclusive conservatism.

In high-stakes testing, where tests affect everything from teacher evaluations to school finance, Florida has been a pioneer. With the introduction of this new exam, the state makes a great advancement by using educational policy as a weapon to push an ideological position. We’re discussing the constricting of knowledge that passes muster as “acceptable” under the pretext of standardized testing. It’s not only a pedagogical issue; democratic education itself is at danger. We discuss the context of high-stakes testing here:

Vasquez Heilig, J. & Nichols, S. (2013). A quandary for school leaders: Equity, high-stakes testing and accountability. In L. C. Tillman &. J. J. Scheurich (Eds), Handbook of Research on Educational Leadership for Diversity and Equity (pp. 409-435). New York, NY: Routledge.

Vasquez Heilig. J., Brewer, J. & Pedraza, J. (2018). Examining the myth of accountability, high-stakes testing and the achievement gap, Journal of Family Strengths, 18(1), 1-14.

The Students Are the Real Victims

And let’s not forget the students, especially those from underrepresented groups. Long serving as gatekeepers, high stakes exams have restricted educational chances for individuals who are already underprivileged. Now that ideological substance has been added to the mix, these difficulties are heightened by the new test. It involves more than just providing accurate answers; it also involves adhering to a particular worldview. Imagine overcoming institutional educational obstacles just to take a test that evaluates your ideological conformity in addition to your academic ability. Our most vulnerable pupils stand to lose the most because the stakes are so extremely high. We discuss the consequences of high-stakes tests for youth here:

Vasquez Heilig, J., Marachi, R., & Cruz, D. (2016). Mismatched assumptions: Motivation, grit, and high-stakes testing. In S. Nichols (Ed.), Educational policies and youth in the 21st century: Problems, potential, and progress, (pp. 145-157).  Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

A Call to Alertness

I appreciate you giving me a chance to discuss this pressing issue. As we have seen throughout history, as noted in our peer reviewed scholarship, there is a deliberate connection between politics, curriculum, and state exams. When the educational futures of our most marginalized populations are at stake, we have a duty to be attentive and critically engaged.

A well-informed populace with discernment and the capacity for critical thought is essential to our democracy. This core idea is undermined by an entrance exam that leans toward ideological indoctrination. Any attempts to pass off political goals as educational reform must be met with a united front. Our democracy’s health and the future of our students are at stake.

I will also be in Florida at the end of the month to speak at a free speech conference at Flagler College entitled “The Freedom to Teach” See you there!

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Check out and follow my YouTube channel here.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

Click here for Vitae.

African American Community Agenda Discusses Education Censorship

African American Community Agenda Initiative (AAI), the Alumnae Chapter of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Psi Boulé of Sigma Pi Phi Fraternity co-hosted an AAI Virtual Summit on the attack on anti-racism initiatives, mainly through our education institution by mischaracterizing and rebranding a field of academic study referred to as Critical Race Theory (CRT). Watch the LIVE Summit below that took place on November 16, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. (ET) on FaceBook Live and was simulcast on WLOU Radio (Louisville).

Featuring Marvin Lynn Georgina Cecilia Pérez Keffrelyn Brown Adrienne Dixon Gerald Neal Julian Vasquez Heilig and many more!

AAI, is a policy initiative organized in 2010, featuring a wide array of primarily African American stakeholders, leaders, and operatives that come together to discuss and address the issues that confront the African American community. It draws input from across Kentucky and the nation.

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Check out and follow my YouTube channel here.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

Click here for Vitae.

Critical Race Theory, what it is and isn’t

I sat down for a few minutes with Dr. Gerald Smith on the Eastern Standard podcast that aired on NPR WEKU to discuss Critical Race Theory (CRT), what it is and isn’t. For some, CRT has become a catch-all phrase for discussions about race, so in this podcast we discuss what CRT actually is for the general public. In this podcast we also discuss CRT and curriculum in elementary, middle and high schools. See also our study of social studies curriculum using CRT in the Harvard Education Review here. Listen below.

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Check out and follow my YouTube channel here.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

Click here for Vitae.

The Confederacy: You have a choice

Reblogged from Jim Golden, an AP US History teacher:

If you are confused as to why so many Americans are defending the confederate flag, monuments, and statues right now, I put together a quick Q&A, with questions from a hypothetical person with misconceptions and answers from my perspective as an AP U.S. History Teacher:

Q: What did the Confederacy stand for?

A: Rather than interpreting, let’s go directly to the words of the Confederacy’s Vice President, Alexander Stephens. In his “Cornerstone Speech” on March 21, 1861, he stated “The Constitution… rested upon the equality of races. This was an error. Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth.”

Q: But people keep saying heritage, not hate! They think the purpose of the flags and monuments are to honor confederate soldiers, right?

A: The vast majority of confederate flags flying over government buildings in the south were first put up in the 1960’s during the Civil Rights Movement. So for the first hundred years after the Civil War ended, while relatives of those who fought in it were still alive, the confederate flag wasn’t much of a symbol at all. But when Martin Luther King, Jr. and John Lewis were marching on Washington to get the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) passed, leaders in the south felt compelled to fly confederate flags and put up monuments to honor people who had no living family members and had fought in a war that ended a century ago. Their purpose in doing this was to exhibit their displeasure with black people fighting for basic human rights that were guaranteed to them in the 14th and 15th Amendments but being withheld by racist policies and practices.

Q: But if we take down confederate statues and monuments, how will we teach about and remember the past?

A: Monuments and statues pose little educational relevance, whereas museums, the rightful place for Confederate paraphernalia, can provide more educational opportunities for citizens to learn about our country’s history. The Civil War is important to learn about, and will always loom large in social studies curriculum. Removing monuments from public places and putting them in museums also allows us to avoid celebrating and honoring people who believed that tens of millions of black Americans should be legal property.

Q: But what if the Confederate flag symbol means something different to me?

A: Individuals aren’t able to change the meaning of symbols that have been defined by history. When I hang a Bucs flag outside my house, to me, the Bucs might represent the best team in the NFL, but to the outside world, they represent an awful NFL team, since they haven’t won a playoff game in 18 years. I can’t change that meaning for everyone who drives by my house because it has been established for the whole world to see. If a Confederate flag stands for generic rebellion or southern pride to you, your personal interpretation forfeits any meaning once you display it publicly, as its meaning takes on the meaning it earned when a failed regime killed hundreds of thousands of Americans in an attempt to destroy America and keep black people enslaved forever.

Q: But my uncle posted a meme that said the Civil War/Confederacy was about state’s rights and not slavery?

A: “A state’s right to what?” – John Green

Q: Everyone is offended about everything these days. Should we take everything down that offends anyone?

A: The Confederacy literally existed to go against the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the idea that black people are human beings that deserve to live freely. If that doesn’t upset or offend you, you are un-American.

Q: Taking these down goes against the First Amendment and freedom of speech, right?

A: No. Anyone can do whatever they want on their private property, on their social media, etc. Taking these down in public, or having private corporations like NASCAR ban them on their properties, has literally nothing to do with the Bill of Rights.

Q: How can people claim to be patriotic while supporting a flag that stood for a group of insurgent failures who tried to permanently destroy America and killed 300,000 Americans in the process?

A: No clue.

Q: So if I made a confederate flag my profile picture, or put a confederate bumper sticker on my car, what am I declaring to my friends, family, and the world?

A: That you support the Confederacy. To recap, the Confederacy stands for: slavery, white supremacy, treason, failure, and a desire to permanently destroy Selective history as it supports white supremacy.

It’s no accident that:

You learned about Helen Keller instead of W.E.B, DuBois

You learned about the Watts and L.A. Riots, but not Tulsa or Wilmington.

You learned that George Washington’s dentures were made from wood, rather than the teeth from slaves.

You learned about black ghettos, but not about Black Wall Street.

You learned about the New Deal, but not “red lining.”

You learned about Tommie Smith’s fist in the air at the 1968 Olympics, but not that he was sent home the next day and stripped of his medals.

You learned about “black crime,” but white criminals were never lumped together and discussed in terms of their race.

You learned about “states rights” as the cause of the Civil War, but not that slavery was mentioned 80 times in the articles of secession.

Privilege is having history rewritten so that you don’t have to acknowledge uncomfortable facts.

Racism is perpetuated by people who refuse to learn or acknowledge this reality.

You have a choice. – Jim Golden

NAACP Education and Civil Rights Initiative’s Critical Race Theory Webinar

Before all the Critical Race Theory (CRT) state legislative filings, the NAACP Education and Civil Rights Initiative at the University of Kentucky College of Education held a webinar on CRT and Ethnic Studies back in April. The webinar featured appearances from Lynn, Matias, Vincent, Martinez and others… Check it out here: https://uky.zoom.us/rec/share/-KjTb0W1NqRzAqS1ZZYqDhZB1YapI-P02rxege7ufcGUeGRTxLUG_4ftyP8MOFK0.MnEwPUN5hzducxOz

Wouldn’t it be great if you could edit typos out of tweets?

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Check out and follow my YouTube channel here.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

Click here for Vitae.