News Ticker

The Teat: @ntlBAEO, Choice, $, and Strings Attached?

Today The Teat returns to discuss The Black Alliance for Educational Options (BAEO).

A few days ago I was giving an interview to an LA Times reporter for an upcoming piece they are going to publish on Teach For America. About midway through the discussion the reporter asked, “Who funds your research?” I replied, I am a scholar, this is what I do for a living, as a tenured faculty member, my time-honored role is to create knowledge for society. I am not saying I have not been hired in the past to consult on various research projects or serve(d) on various advisory boards. However, my peer-reviewed research has not been bought. More on this later…

I have also noticed over the past several years when submitting to peer-reviewed journals, they are now asking who funded the research. Why might this now be necessary? It is also now typical that at the end of an article peer-reviewed journals will now state openly who paid for research…

This brings me to a Tweet i recently received

Screen Shot 2013-07-25 at 1.37.30 PM

The tweeter was referring to a new “survey” conducted by The Black Alliance for Educational Options.  Edweek reported:

The vast majority of African-American voters in four Southern states believe the government should provide as many educational choices as possible to ensure their children receive a good education, says a new report released by the Black Alliance for Educational Options, a school choice advocacy group.

[BAEO] acknowledged that it is not impartial on the issue of school choice. The Black Alliance for Educational Options states in the beginning of the report that it is an advocacy organization that aims to increase the amount of educational options available for black children.

And within the survey itself, the report says that after asking initial questions about charters to gauge the survey participants’ knowledge of charter schools, participants were then given “informed ballot questions prefaced with facts about charters.”

Those facts included nuggets like “charter schools in some communities have led to significant gains in academic performance, graduation rates, and college readiness for lower-income black students” and “charter public schools serving Black students were over three times as likely to close the achievement gap.”

Clearly BAEO used classic tactics to insert bias into research via recency effects. Who is BAEO? Why might BAEO have been motivated to blatantly introduce bias to the survey respondents? From whose Teat do they partake? In a piece published more than a decade ago Susan Ohanian wrote:

With the voucher legislation and ballot initiatives of the 1980s failing, voucher proponents embraced a new strategy adopting the language of the civil rights movement and targeting the African American community. This political strategy is designed to boost support for vouchers, not only among African Americans, but also among progressive and moderate suburban whites, many of whom support strong public schools. The current public relations and legislative focus on poor children does not alter right-wing voucher proponents’ long-term goal of broader-based voucher systems and privatization that would irreparably harm public education.

BAEO announced its formation on August 24, 2000 at a national press conference in Washington, D.C. Former Milwaukee Schools Superintendent Dr. Howard Fuller, the group’s president and founder, said it would support tax-funded voucher programs, private scholarships, tuition tax credits, charter schools and public/private partnerships.

In March 2001, BAEO began its organizing efforts with its first annual meeting in Milwaukee  bringing over 600 African-American voucher backers from 35 states together for the express purpose of starting local chapters. By May, chapters were operating in Milwaukee, New York, Denver, Indianapolis and Philadelphia and the group claimed to be organizing chapters in nine other cities. Two months later, BAEO announced the formation of a new chapter in St. Louis, which immediately announced plans to start running ads.11 One of the Indianapolis chapter’s first activities was to host a conference with the prominent African American voucher supporter Rev. Floyd Flake as the keynote speaker.12 By the summer of 2002, BAEO had tapped into the network of existing local African-American voucher supporters and formed 33 local chapters.13

BAEO quickly converted the new activists into spokespeople, amplifying its press coverage. BAEO spokespeople were quoted widely in national education stories such as the Supreme Court’s hearing of the Cleveland voucher case and on the debate over President Bush’s voucher proposals. BAEO joined the roster of pro-voucher press conferences and briefings, often teaming up with representatives from pro-voucher partisans like the Cato Institute and controversial researcher Paul Peterson.

BAEO bills itself as a coalition of up-and-coming leaders working within the African-American community. But a closer look shows that BAEO has been bankrolled by a small number of right-wing foundations better known for supporting education privatization and affirmative action rollbacks than empowerment of the African American community or low-income families.

Four groups that BAEO originally listed as benefactors back in 2001 are major players in the right-wing voucher movement. In fact, the Walton Foundation and the Bradley Foundation have financed much of the movement. The Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation and the American Education Reform Council are pro-voucher advocacy groups that while also receiving significant funding from the Walton and Bradley Foundations are lending their own significant support to BAEO, the relative newcomer.

Right-wing groups have also put a great deal of effort into cultivating African-American spokespeople, and working to counter the legacy of mistrust that communities of color have for a movement that has historically ranged from indifference to opposition toward racial justice efforts. Yet, at the same time, the right-wing political movement has continued to attack traditional civil rights leaders and initiatives.

BAEO is the latest step in the Right’s long effort to portray school vouchers as the new civil rights fight. The group does bring together many African-American voucher supporters and only a fraction of them are involved in right-wing politics in general. But BAEO takes its place among the other think tanks and local organizations that have been created with money from right-wing foundations as well as individuals and organizations hoping to profit from promoting increased privatization of public education.

There is much, much more on BAEO and from funding sources in the Ohanian article. (Also check out Cloaking Inequity’s other posts in The Teat series) A decade later they are up to the same false consciousness. What’s going on with BAEO lately? Well, $10 million more from the Walton and Gates Foundations.

So we know which side BAEO’s bread is buttered.

So looping back to my conversation with the LA Times reporter… Is it possible for academics supported by choice-biased foundations to publish research that show no effects of school choice? What if for example you were an endowed chair of school choice and funded heavily by the Walton foundation etc… Have you ever seen such a person, if in fact they might exist, publish work that shows no effect of choice even while the predominance of the peer-reviewed literature has opposite findings? Food for thought.

Clearly BAEO wants to play the race card/civil rights card. I agree that parents need choice, but I have proffered on CI here is REAL choice. The general public can see through BAEO’s ideology and biased/bought research methods. Furthermore, the predominance of independent empirical research does not support their exaggerated claims on choice (See my Senate testimony on charters). Also, click for all of Cloaking Inequity’s posts on vouchers and charters.

In conclusion, what is The Teat series without it’s Haiku?

Choice a Moniker

Green leaves flutter in the breeze

The Walton money tree

Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.

Want to know about Cloaking Inequity’s freshly pressed conversations about educational policy? Click the “Follow blog by email” button in the upper left hand corner of this page.

Twitter: @ProfessorJVH

p.s. Thanks for Sylvia from Austin for digging up BAEO’s latest money trail.

About Dr. Julian Vasquez Heilig (713 Articles)
Julian Vasquez Heilig is an award-winning researcher and teacher. He is currently a Professor of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies and the Director of the Doctorate in Educational Leadership at California State Sacramento.

7 Comments on The Teat: @ntlBAEO, Choice, $, and Strings Attached?

  1. Thank you so much for the post. “Citizen Stewart” is paid by the ed reform crowd in Minneapolis. He gets paid to troll, post, tweet, Facebook for all sorts of groups the reformers have going, like SFER etc. He is paid to represent North Minneapolis, and lives in a town 75 miles out of the Twin Cities. He is a sociopath and folks are sick to death of him.


  2. One other interesting thing worth noting is that Fuller, BEAO’s leader, has been intimately involved in one of the worst voucher schools (now charter school) in Milwaukee. He started and has been Board president of CEO Leadership School. He used his political influence to be granted two more schools from the City charter authority (Quest Schools) despite the poor performance of CEO. CEO is the worst performing school in the City charter system. His lack of humility is simply overwhelming.


  3. Kim Jennings // July 31, 2013 at 9:56 am // Reply

    This is so on target. NJ voters are poised to elect as its new Senator well-known TV commentator and Newark Mayor Booker, who is also a member of the board of BAEO. BTW, he is the front-runner in the Democratic primary, with major backing from NY’s financial community.


    • Kim Jennings // August 2, 2013 at 3:31 am // Reply

      Correction. Looks like Booker is former BAEO board member, recent presenter at their legislative conferences and meetings.


  4. Lourdes Perez Ramirez // July 29, 2013 at 5:20 pm // Reply

    I have seen Hispanic education organizations favor choice for the money involved. One such org that comes to mind is Hispanic CREO- ttp:// Unfortunately, organizations like Hispanic CREO, which stands for Hispanic Council for Reform and Educational Options, justify the need for charter schools based on the “educational crisis that exists within the Hispanic community nationally” which is true.

    What is not true, though, is that these charter schools really help Hispanics close the achievement gap. If that would be the case, even I would open a charter school, without government money.


  5. Monty J. Thornburg, Ph.D. // July 28, 2013 at 11:42 pm // Reply

    Yes, “Money talks” said, Professor, Robert Brown, in a taped interview 2005 as we watched trapped Black bodies floating in the streets of New Orleans on T.V. He was the first Black Superintendent in the South, 1969-1980, Greene County, Alabama. Brown was talking about efforts in Greene County, Alabama to support the new “white” academy after whites lost political control of the public school district there in 1969. Privatization efforts since the Civil Rights ERA have been on-going and your Blog post here is informative about a strategy that grew out of the Nixon Southern strategy. The strategy morphed into the Reagan “privatization” revolution in the 80s starting with the first Fed. Department of Education’s Sec. Wm. Bennett. It was Carter’s idea to create a Dept. of Ed., at the Fed. level and I now wish it had been left as HEW, Health Education and Welfare as I now see the Affordable “Healthcare law” and “Food Supplemental Programs” under attack. Try teaching a hungry student who is ill and his parents can’t afford treatment. The Walton and Gates support of BAEO is sinister in my opinion. Now we have Black trapped bodies in the abandoned city of Detroit, abandoned through privatization schemes still on-going. I wish privatization were only about education; but, politically, it’s much larger.


  6. Reblogged this on Rise & Shine and commented:
    A reminder to always follow the money.


12 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The Teat: BAEO, Choice, $, and Strings Attached? | Cloaking Inequity ← NPE News Briefs
  2. Heilig on Black Alliance for Educational Options: Follow the Money | Diane Ravitch's blog
  3. Express Yourself: A Lyrical Critique of Reformers | Cloaking Inequity
  4. Billionaires co-opt minority groups into campaign for education reform | Cloaking Inequity
  5. Back-to-School? Classrooms by Walmart?: Feel Guilty About Shopping at Walmart | Cloaking Inequity
  6. Charters (Buicks) are Good Because They are Charters (Cars): DUH! | Cloaking Inequity
  7. New Research: Vouchers— schools do the choosing | Cloaking Inequity
  8. Honoring MLK’s legacy (and not co-opting it) – Cloaking Inequity
  9. The Seductive Allures of School Choice
  10. EdWeek is WRONG about this
  11. DFERs should be nervous. Serious. Many Thank you’s! – Cloaking Inequity
  12. Hate and Love: Top Five @Twitter blocks and Top Ten Follows – Cloaking Inequity

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: