Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…)

Screen Shot 2013-01-27 at 6.25.53 PM

Vasquez Heilig, J. & Jez, S. (2010). Teach For America: A review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center, University of Colorado. Retrieve from 
http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teach-for-america

Teach For America (TFA) aims to address teacher shortages by sending graduates from elite colleges, most of whom do not have a background in education, to teach in low-income rural and urban schools for a two-year commitment. The impact of these graduates is hotly debated by those who, on the one hand, see this as a way to improve the supply of teachers by enticing some of America’s top students into teaching and those who, on the other hand, see the program as a harmful dalliance into the lives of low-income students who most need highly trained and highly skilled teachers. The question for most districts, however, is whether TFA teachers do as well as or better than credentialed non-TFA teachers with whom school districts aim to staff their schools. On this question, studies indicate that the students of novice TFA teachers perform significantly less well in reading and mathematics than those of credentialed beginning teachers. Thus, a simple answer to the question of TFA teachers’ relative effectiveness cannot be conclusively drawn from the research; many factors are involved in any comparison. The lack of a consistent impact, however, should indicate to policymakers that TFA is likely not the panacea that will reduce disparities in educational outcomes. The evidence suggests that districts may benefit from using TFA personnel to fill teacher shortages when the available labor pool consists of temporary or substitute teachers or other novice alternatively and provisionally certified teachers likely to leave in a few years. Nevertheless, if educational leaders plan to use TFA teachers as a solution to the problem of shortages, they should be prepared for constant attrition and the associated costs of ongoing recruitment and training.

See my discussion of the TFA brief at a US Senate briefing on S. 1716. A conversation on Louisiana PBS Teach for America in Louisiana and Seattle KURO Radio 97.3 Teach For America in Seattle

About these ads

Tags: , , , , , ,

Categories: Teach For America

Author:Julian Vasquez Heilig

Julian Vasquez Heilig is currently an Associate Professor of Educational Policy and Planning and African and African Diaspora Studies (by courtesy) at the University of Texas at Austin.

Social Media

Subscribe to my RSS feed and social profiles to receive updates.

8 Comments on “Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…)”

  1. John Young
    March 7, 2013 at 9:00 pm #

    Reblogged this on Transparent Christina.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. A Website You Should Watch « Diane Ravitch's blog - August 31, 2012

    [...] has conducted important research on Teach for America and KIPP that reviews their [...]

  2. A Roundup: Lean Times, Kool-Aid, and Teach For America | Cloaking Inequity - November 30, 2012

    [...] JULIAN VASQUEZ HEILIG & SU JIN JEZ, Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence, National Education Policy Center [...]

  3. Letter to a Friend: Teach For America Alabama | Cloaking Inequity - December 31, 2012

    [...] have discussed Teach For America (TFA) previously in the New York Times and in widely-discussed brief for the NEPC. See CI’s full TFA thread here. Larry Hill recently sent along an email that was [...]

  4. The Teat: ~Half Billion for Teach (Temp) For America | Cloaking Inequity - January 18, 2013

    [...] 2010, in our policy brief entitled Teach For America: A Review of the Evidence we [...]

  5. The Teat: Teach For America— Expensive & Convincing Inequity | Cloaking Inequity - February 4, 2013

    [...] of government funding and positive feel-good press, our independent review of peer-reviewed research published by NEPC found that TFA has a high-turnover rate, is costly (We calculated that the actual [...]

  6. New Teach For America study (and meme) debated in WaPo | Cloaking Inequity - April 8, 2013

    [...] many non-peer reviewed studies that analyze TFA— which produce mixed results— as we discussed here. Su Jin Jez, Cal State Sacramento faculty member (also a good friend of mine since grad school), [...]

  7. Frank Convo with KIPP’s Mike Feinberg: Do you call BS? | Cloaking Inequity - April 25, 2013

    [...] Reflection: Teach For American attrition approaches 80% in years 3-4. See Teach For America: A review of the evidence (The research that TFA loves to hate…) [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Crazy Crawfish's Blog

Zesty Politics with a Dollop of Louisiana Goodness

Living in Dialogue

"It does not require many words to speak the truth." Chief Joseph, Nez Perce

The Answer Sheet

"It does not require many words to speak the truth." Chief Joseph, Nez Perce

Diane Ravitch's blog

A site to discuss better education for all

A "Fuller" Look at Education Issues

Examining K-12 and higher ed issues across the country by Dr. Ed Fuller

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,621 other followers

%d bloggers like this: